• S. O. Rykov National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education named after P.L. Shupyk of the Ministry of Public Health of Ukraine Kyiv, Ukraine
  • A. M. Serhienko National Pyrohov Memorial Medical University Vinnytsia, Ukraine Medical Center “Professor`s Serhienko Eye Clinic” Vinnytsia, Ukraine
  • K. K. Tkachuk National Technical University, Institute of Energy Saving and Energy Management Kyiv, Ukraine
  • V. V. Serhienko Medical Center “Professor`s Serhienko Eye Clinic” Vinnytsia, Ukraine



Retina, silicone oil, retinal detachment, retinal tamponade, vitreoretinopathy


Summary. The source material for our study was 23 samples of silicone oil, aspirated from the vitreous cavities of the eyes of patients after a tamponade with regard to the rheumatogenic and traction retinal detachment. The average life of silicone oil in the eye was 3.5 months. In all cases, a 1300 cSt – viscosity Oxane silicone oil (Baush & Lomb, UK), was used for tamponade.
All samples were stabilized, resulting in colloidal systems consisting of a direct emulsion of two cross-saturated (aqueous and oily) liquid phases.
The density of samples aspirated from the patients’ eyes was measured at a temperature of 20.00±0.05°C by a pycnometric method, taking into account the adjustment for a loss of body weight in the air (0.00129 g/cm3).
The viscosity measurement method using the Ostwald capillary viscometer (at a temperature of 20.00±0.050°C) was used to measure the relative viscosity of samples by a three-time adjusting the viscometer for water phases against the distilled water (checking the viscosity measurement results against 96 % ethyl alcohol and acetone), and the viscometer for oil phases – against a 100 % dimethylpolysiloxane (checking the viscosity measuring results against glycerin).

The criteria for complications were the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy with recurrence of retinal detachment or an increase of intraocular pressure above 21 mm Hg. in the postoperative period.
Depending on the density of the oil phase, patients were divided into 4 groups: Group 1 – the density of the oil phase (o.p.) – less the density of distilled water and practically corresponding to the density of silicone oil (d20=0.9700–0.9799 g/cm3); Group 2 – the density of the o.p. – less the water density, but greater than the density of pure silicone oil (d20=0.9800–0.9981 g/cm3); Group 3 – the density of the o.p. – practically equal to the density of distilled water (d20=0.9982–1.0049 g/cm3); and Group 4 – density of the o.p.– above the density of distilled water (d20=1.0050–1.0100 g/cm3).
The study revealed that the physicochemical properties, such as the density (growing and in some cases exceeding the density of distilled water) and the viscosity (signifi cantly decreasing), were changing in most patients (with a different magnitude) in the process of tamponade and continuous presence of silicone oil in the vitreous cavity of the eye.
The density of the oil phases of aspirated samples had an exponential relation to the viscosity. The number of postoperative complications such as development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy followed by formation of a recurred retinal detachment and an increase of the intraocular pressure above 21 mm Hg. depended on the density of a silicone bubble.


Тахчиди Х. П. Обоснование раннего удаления силиконового масла при лечении тяжелых отслоек сетчатки различного генеза / Х. П. Тахчиди, С. А Метаев, Н. Я Глинчук [и др.] // Новые технологии микрохирургии глаза. – Оренбург, 2004. – С. 60–65.

Abrams G. W. The incidence of corneal abnormalities in the Silicone Study. Silicone Study Report 7 / G. W. Abrams, S. P. Azen, C. C. Barr [et al.] // Arch.Ophtalmol. – 1995. – Vol. 113 (6). – P. 764–769.

Al-Jazzaf A. M. Incidence and management of elevation intraocular pressure after silicone oil injection /A. M. Al-Jazzaf, P. A. Netland, S. J. Charles // Glaucoma. – 2005. – Vol. 14 (1). – P. 40–46.

Azuaro-Blanco A. Pseudo-endothelial dystrophy associated with emulsifi ed silicone oil / A. Azuaro-Blanco, H. S. Dua, C. T. Pillai // Cornea. – 1999. – Vol. 18 (4). – P. 493–494.

Bennet S. R. Band keratopathy from emulsifi ed silicone oil / S. R. Bennet // Arch. Ophtalmol. – 1990. – Vol. 108 (10). – P. 1387.

Costarides A. P. Elevated intraocular pressure following vitreoretinal surgery / A. P. Costarides, P. Alabata, C. Bergstrom // Ophtalmology Clinics of North America. – 2004. – Vol. 17 (4). – P. 507–512.

Crisp A. Effect of silicone oil viscosity on emulsifi cation / A. Crisp, E. de Juan, J. Trederman //Arch. Ophtalmol. – 1987. – Vol. 105 (4). – P. 546–550.

Dresp J. H. Interaction of different ocular endotamponades as a risk factor for silicone oil emulsifi cation/J. H. Dresp, Dirk-Henning Menz // Retina. – 2005. – Vol. 25. – P. 902–910.

El-Aliem A. A. Persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in patients underwent conventional pars plana vitrectomy: incidence, risk factors and causes/Ahmad Abd El-Aliem, Ahmad Elsayed Hudieb // International Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. – 2015. – Vol. 2 (2). – P. 4–7.

Errera M. H. Using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging to identify the presence of retinal silicone oil emulsifi cation after silicone oil tamponade / M. H. Errera, S. E. Liyanage, M. Elgohary [et al.] // Retina. – 2013. – Vol. 33 (8). – P. 1567–1573.

Han D. P. Mechanisms of intraocular pressure elevation after pars plana vitrectomy / D. P. Han, H. Lewis, F. H. Lambrou [et al.] // Оphtalmology. – 1989. – Vol. 96. – P. 1357.

Hasegawa Y. Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy for varios vitreoretinal disorders / Y. Hasegawa, F. Okamoto, Y. Sugiura [et al.] // European journal of oftalmology. – 2013. – Vol. 24 (2). – P. 235–241.

Heidenkummer H. P. Emulsifi cation of silicone oils with specifi c physicochemical characteristics / H. P. Heidenkummer, A. Kampik, S. Thierfelder // Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophtalmol. – 1991. – Vol. 229 (1). – P. 88–94.

Hoerauf H. Combined use of partially fl uorinated alkanes, perfl uorocarbon liquids and silicone oil: an experemental study / H. Hoerauf, K. Kobuch, J. Dresp, D. H. Menz // Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophtalmol. – 2001. – Vol. 239. – P. 373–381.

Hoerauf H. Severe emulsifi cation after combined use of partially fl uorinated alkane and silicone oil / H. Hoerauf, H. Laqua // Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophtalmol. – 2002. – Vol. 240. – P. 131–136.

Ichpujani P. Silicone oil indused glaucoma: a review / P. Ichpujani, A. Jindal, L. J. Katz // Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophtalmol. – 2009. –Vol. 247. – P. 1585– 1593.

Meinert H. Semifl uorinated alkanes – A new class of compounds with outstanding properties for use in ophthalmology / H. Meinert, T. Roy // Eur. J Ophtalmol. – 2000. – Vol. 10. – P. 189–197.

Mrejen S. Intraretinal and intra-optic nerve head silicone oil vacuoles using adaptive optics / S. Mrejen, T. Sato, Y. Fisher, R. F. Spaide // Ophtalmic.Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina. – 2015. – Vol. 45 (1). – P. 71–73.

Odrobina D. Analysis of the time and location of the silicone oil emulsifi cation by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography after silicone oil tamponade / D. Odrobina, I. Laudaska-Olszewska // Biomed. Res. Int. – 2014. – Vol. 37. – 2045 P.

Patel A. V. Silicone Oil Emulsifi cation in Retina Surgery / A. V. Patel, T. D. Papakostas, D. Eliott // Retina today. – 2015. – Vol. 9. – P. 29–32.

Tan H. S. Silicone oil removal after regmatogenous retinal detachment: comparing techniques / H. S. Tan, R. Dell’Omo, M. Mura // Eye. – 2012. – Vol. 26. – P. 444–447.

de Vries M. M. Glaucoma drainage device surgery after vitreoretinal surgery: incidence and risk factors / M. M. de Vries, R. P. Müskens, V. W. Renardel de Lavalette [et al.] // Acta Ophtalmologica. – 2016. – Vol. 94. – P. 135–139.





Clinical Ophthalmology